News/
Column
Transparency Is a Means - not the Goal - When You Want to Raise Working Media
Improving the efficiency of programmatic media buying takes stronger governance—not just more transparency. Here’s how to get more out of the investment and lift the share of working media.
From more data points to better governance
Programmatic buying promised precision, efficiency, and transparency. Yet the real blockers often lie elsewhere: siloed organizations, weak processes, complex tools, poor prioritization, and stacked adtech layers that dilute working media. The priority must shift from accumulating data to strengthening how the work is governed.
See the whole cost pyramid - not just the fee
The greatest potential to increase working media sits inside the marketing organization—structures, workflows, and decision paths—well before agency fees and tech charges are negotiated.
– First, define working media consistently. Capture all costs—internal (people and systems) and external (partners and platforms)—to get a true picture. Otherwise, “moving” costs can create the illusion of progress without increasing exposure.
– Then simplify to release budget. By streamlining processes, reducing fragmentation, and consolidating tools and vendors, it is repeatedly possible to free 20–30% of the total marketing budget and reallocate it to working media.
More transparency ≠ more effect
Limited insight often stems from how value-chain revenues are created. But more granular reporting does not automatically improve outcomes.
– Even where vendors are transparent about where money goes, effect doesn’t necessarily rise.
– Costly add‑ons, unnecessary systems, and over‑segmentation lower the share of working media without demonstrated business impact.
The price of fragmentation
The media buying business model often rewards complexity: more channels, more units, more transactions. The result is overactivity without commensurate effect. Scaling down the number of channels, units, and activities improves governance and measurement – while lowering handling fees and raising working media.
Targeting and data purchases: big costs, thin marginal gains
Tech and data fees can be justified, but their incremental effect frequently fails to offset the added cost. Across programmatic formats—social, display, video, audio, search – simpler reach strategies and cleaner KPIs often outperform advanced segmentation at a lower total cost.
Right problem, wrong solution
The core issue isn’t a lack of data or transparency; it’s the operating model. The answer is simplification, fewer layers, clearer accountability, and tighter processes.
When advertisers take command of their operating model – organization, workflow, media mix, and measurement – simplicity, reach, and effect beat layer‑upon‑layer logic. That is how working media is rescued and results improve.
The article was initially published in the Swedish marketing trade magazine Resumé.